UAV
Factory’s Portable Ground Control Station
As
a leading developer of Unmanned Aerial Systems, as well as appropriate
subsystems and accessories, UAV Factory produces a Portable Ground Control
Station for use on a wide variety of unmanned airframes (UAV Factory, 2017).
This system boasts a universal design, to be used with not only products
developed and sold by UAV Factory, but also maintains a capability to be used
off the shelf with practically any commercial/civilian unmanned aircraft. It is
designed as a portable system, based around the Panasonic CF-31Toughbook with
carry handles, wheels, and shoulder straps. The rugged design allows this
system to be loaded up in the back of a truck or other vehicle, and taken on
site anywhere that may be needed. As a visual interface, the ground control
station utilizes two ultra-bright touch screen displays, one 17 inches and
integrated into the system, and the other 13 inches and attached to a separate,
not included, Toughbook computer. To maintain positive control throughout the
flight, the system features a 10-32 VDC power cable, as well as two swappable
batteries for areas where an outlet is unavailable. For data link connectivity,
the system hosts two 12-volt outputs protected by fuses that are easily
accessible to the user (UAV Factory, 2017).
Human
Factor Issues
Standardization
A major
human factor found within this particular ground control station is actually
designed to be an overall strength within the system. That is, the complete
customizability found in the off the shelf model. While this can be extremely
useful in producing a single product that can be marketed to a wide variety of
users, products, and applications, a lack of standardization amongst Ground
Control Stations attributes to nearly 25% of human factor related UAS mishaps (Waraich, 2013). UAV Factory’s Portable Ground Control
Station can be set up to utilize any combination of touch screen controls,
joysticks, game controllers, touchpads, or a myriad of other input systems.
This means that varying operators may be accustomed to control using a certain
method on another control system, potentially hindering their operation as they
move to a different GCS. Any moment of hesitation or confusion on the operator’s
part in any aviation operation could quickly be the cause of a mishap.
According to a study conducted by Dr. Waraich, standardization of the input and
output methods of ground control stations, to include the increased use of
automation. May reduce ergonomic human factors, and in turn potentially reduce
the number of unmanned aerial system mishaps.
Spatial Disorientation
Spatial Disorientation
occurs when a pilot or operator fails to accurately sense the aircraft’s
motion, attitude, or position as it relates to the Earth’s surface (Self,
Ercoline, Olson, & Tvaryanas, 2006). As with all unmanned aerial systems,
operators using UAV Factory’s Ground Control Station have a distinct
disadvantage in regards to spatial orientation in that they are not physically
located in the aircraft. This means that the operator must rely solely on video
feeds, readings, and other indications displayed on the control station. While
stationary, the operator must translate these data feeds into motion in order
to properly determine spatial orientation of the aircraft. Since this is a
completely portable ground control station, there is the potential of an even
greater degree of difficulty placed on the operator if the system is utilized
on a moving craft, such as a chase vehicle, ship, manned aircraft, etc. In this
case, the operator is physically receiving motion sensations upon their body
that may be counterproductive to those that the UAS is experiencing. In order
to reduce spatial disorientation, flight plans should be modified to avoid
outside stimuli (Self, Ercoline, Olson, & Tvaryanas, 2006). In addition,
the use of 3D maps, Heads Up Displays, and other egocentric display methods can
assist in reducing spatial disorientation (Self, Ercoline, Olson, &
Tvaryanas, 2006), as well as increased training and higher levels of
automation.
Comments
Post a Comment